October172011

BP gets $4 billion from Anadarko for oil spill costs


As part of the settlement announced on Monday, Anadarko also said it will no longer pursue allegations of gross negligence against BP. It is unclear what impact this development will have on the remainder of the morass of litigation pending in federal court in New Orleans, legal experts said.Investors greeted the deal as good news for both companies. BP shares rose 2.2 percent in London and Anadarko shares closed 5.5 percent higher at $74.44 on the New York Stock Exchange.”We maintain our view that the ultimate cost to BP could fall … substantially below the cost inferred by the share price fall since the accident,” said Richard Griffith, an oil analyst at Evolution Securities.Anadarko, based in Woodlands, Texas, was a 25 percent partner in the doomed Macondo well. It sued BP in April, claiming that gross negligence by BP caused the blowout and saying that BP is responsible for economic losses from the incident. BP, in turn, invoiced Anadarko $6.1 billion for spill-related costs it calculated Anadarko owed.The settlement announced on Monday is “favorable for both companies,” BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley said.Without a deal, Anadarko could have been on the hook for 25 percent of the cost of cleanup, compensating those affected, and any government fines. BP has said the total bill for the oil spill, including fines, will be $42 billion. This suggests Anadarko could have faced a total bill well above the $4 billion it agreed to pay.It could only avoid this responsibility by proving in court that BP had been grossly negligent — something that could have added around $18 billion to the total amount of fines BP faced. Fines for leaking oil into U.S. waters are assessed at $1,100 per barrel, or $4,300 if gross negligence is proven. The government has said the Macondo well leaked almost 5 million barrels into the sea.Anadarko would still be liable for its share of any fines payable to the U.S. government, according to the deal.Anadarko’s $4 billion payment will be made in cash and paid into the victims’ compensation fund BP established last year, Anadarko spokesman John Christiansen said.On October 12, the U.S. offshore drilling regulator — the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement — formally issued violation notices against BP, Transocean and Halliburton for their roles in the oil spill. BP received most of the 15 citations, ranging from failure to protect health and property to failing to keep the well under control. A report the previous month found BP solely responsible for 21 of 35 causes of the disaster.BP has sued Transocean, the owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon rig, Halliburton Co, which supplied cement to cap the well, and Cameron International Corp, which designed the blowout preventer, a device that was supposed to stop the surge of oil, to share the cost of the spill and cleanup.These lawsuits are among hundreds of claims set to go to trial before a federal judge in New Orleans in February.It is unclear what impact the Anadarko settlement could have on these disputes, legal experts said. “Perhaps (the deal) creates some momentum toward other settlements because it suggests BP is willing to resolve claims,” said Howard Erichson, an expert in complex litigation and a professor of law at Fordham University. “But I’m not sure it gives Transocean or Halliburton any particular reason to revise whatever calculations they have made.”A Halliburton spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.Transocean spokesman Lou Colasuonno said: “It is time for BP to step up and make good on its contractual responsibility to defend and indemnify its subcontractors.”If BP recoups cash from Transocean or Halliburton, it will pay a portion of this — up to $1 billion — to Anadarko under the terms of the deal announced on Monday.In May, BP agreed to accept $1.1 billion from a third partner in Macondo, Mitsui & Co, to cover its 10 percent share of cleanup costs. The following month, Weatherford International Ltd, which provided equipment for the Macondo well, agreed to pay BP $75 million.The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 2:10-md-02179.

9PM

BP gets $4 billion from Anadarko for oil spill costs


As part of the settlement announced on Monday, Anadarko also said it will no longer pursue allegations of gross negligence against BP. It is unclear what impact this development will have on the remainder of the morass of litigation pending in federal court in New Orleans, legal experts said.Investors greeted the deal as good news for both companies. BP shares rose 2.2 percent in London and Anadarko shares closed 5.5 percent higher at $74.44 on the New York Stock Exchange.”We maintain our view that the ultimate cost to BP could fall … substantially below the cost inferred by the share price fall since the accident,” said Richard Griffith, an oil analyst at Evolution Securities.Anadarko, based in Woodlands, Texas, was a 25 percent partner in the doomed Macondo well. It sued BP in April, claiming that gross negligence by BP caused the blowout and saying that BP is responsible for economic losses from the incident. BP, in turn, invoiced Anadarko $6.1 billion for spill-related costs it calculated Anadarko owed.The settlement announced on Monday is “favorable for both companies,” BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley said.Without a deal, Anadarko could have been on the hook for 25 percent of the cost of cleanup, compensating those affected, and any government fines. BP has said the total bill for the oil spill, including fines, will be $42 billion. This suggests Anadarko could have faced a total bill well above the $4 billion it agreed to pay.It could only avoid this responsibility by proving in court that BP had been grossly negligent — something that could have added around $18 billion to the total amount of fines BP faced. Fines for leaking oil into U.S. waters are assessed at $1,100 per barrel, or $4,300 if gross negligence is proven. The government has said the Macondo well leaked almost 5 million barrels into the sea.Anadarko would still be liable for its share of any fines payable to the U.S. government, according to the deal.Anadarko’s $4 billion payment will be made in cash and paid into the victims’ compensation fund BP established last year, Anadarko spokesman John Christiansen said.On October 12, the U.S. offshore drilling regulator — the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement — formally issued violation notices against BP, Transocean and Halliburton for their roles in the oil spill. BP received most of the 15 citations, ranging from failure to protect health and property to failing to keep the well under control. A report the previous month found BP solely responsible for 21 of 35 causes of the disaster.BP has sued Transocean, the owner and operator of the Deepwater Horizon rig, Halliburton Co, which supplied cement to cap the well, and Cameron International Corp, which designed the blowout preventer, a device that was supposed to stop the surge of oil, to share the cost of the spill and cleanup.These lawsuits are among hundreds of claims set to go to trial before a federal judge in New Orleans in February.It is unclear what impact the Anadarko settlement could have on these disputes, legal experts said. “Perhaps (the deal) creates some momentum toward other settlements because it suggests BP is willing to resolve claims,” said Howard Erichson, an expert in complex litigation and a professor of law at Fordham University. “But I’m not sure it gives Transocean or Halliburton any particular reason to revise whatever calculations they have made.”A Halliburton spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.Transocean spokesman Lou Colasuonno said: “It is time for BP to step up and make good on its contractual responsibility to defend and indemnify its subcontractors.”If BP recoups cash from Transocean or Halliburton, it will pay a portion of this — up to $1 billion — to Anadarko under the terms of the deal announced on Monday.In May, BP agreed to accept $1.1 billion from a third partner in Macondo, Mitsui & Co, to cover its 10 percent share of cleanup costs. The following month, Weatherford International Ltd, which provided equipment for the Macondo well, agreed to pay BP $75 million.The case is In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon”, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana, No. 2:10-md-02179.

October132011

UPDATE 1-Valmont Q3 tops; flags Europe slowdown concerns


* Sees FY EPS $5.70-$5.90 vs est $5.87* Sees FY EPS at mid-to-lower end of outlook rangeOct 13 (Reuters) - Valmont Industries Inc posted quarterly results that topped market estimates on higher sales at its irrigation segment but warned that the economic slowdown, particularly in Europe, could hurt its business in the current quarter.The company, which makes infrastructure products such as metal and concrete poles, kept its full-year earnings outlook of $5.70-$5.90 a share but said it now expected “results to be in the mid-to-lower end of that range.”Analysts, on average, expected full-year earnings of $5.87 a share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.For the third quarter, net income rose to $42.1 million, or $1.59 a share, from $25.9 million, or 98 cents a share, a year ago.This result topped the $1.53-a-share profit analysts had expected.Revenue rose 27.34 percent to $672.2 million, spurred by a 71 percent jump in sales at its irrigation segment. Analysts had forecast revenue of $642 million.Shares of the Omaha, Nebraska-based company closed at $90.27 on Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange.

6PM

UPDATE 1-Valmont Q3 tops; flags Europe slowdown concerns


* Sees FY EPS $5.70-$5.90 vs est $5.87* Sees FY EPS at mid-to-lower end of outlook rangeOct 13 (Reuters) - Valmont Industries Inc posted quarterly results that topped market estimates on higher sales at its irrigation segment but warned that the economic slowdown, particularly in Europe, could hurt its business in the current quarter.The company, which makes infrastructure products such as metal and concrete poles, kept its full-year earnings outlook of $5.70-$5.90 a share but said it now expected “results to be in the mid-to-lower end of that range.”Analysts, on average, expected full-year earnings of $5.87 a share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.For the third quarter, net income rose to $42.1 million, or $1.59 a share, from $25.9 million, or 98 cents a share, a year ago.This result topped the $1.53-a-share profit analysts had expected.Revenue rose 27.34 percent to $672.2 million, spurred by a 71 percent jump in sales at its irrigation segment. Analysts had forecast revenue of $642 million.Shares of the Omaha, Nebraska-based company closed at $90.27 on Thursday on the New York Stock Exchange.

October122011

UPDATE 1-Pacific Rubiales, Maurel & Prom sign JV for Peru block


Block 116 (or Lote 116) is spread over 6,600 square kilometres in the Santiago sub-basin located in the Peruvian Andean Foothills.The Canadian oil and gas producer, which has properties in South America, said it will drill two wells at the block and will assume costs of up to $75 million.Maurel & Prom has operations mainly in Africa and Latin America.Shares of Pacific Rubiales closed at C$22.60 on Tuesday on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

Page 1 of 1